Elk River Road Markings

HomeForumsElk River Valley 100Elk River Road Markings

This topic has 8 voices, contains 25 replies, and was last updated by  bikerfello 29 days ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 26 total)
Author Posts
Author Posts
October 6, 2011 at 12:09 PM #472

Tim

Discussion related to improving road markings for the Elk River Valley 100

October 6, 2011 at 12:11 PM #473

Tim

Have you noticed the road markings Jack n Back used? Just got back from a ride and noticed all the hot pink markings. Can’t miss ‘em and there are a lot of ‘em too. Maybe we should consider using them as an example of how we can improve the Elk River Valley 100 road markings?

What do you think?

October 6, 2011 at 7:42 PM #484

Bob Crook

There’s an art to road markings. The following link does a pretty good job of discussing proper arrow painting. http://roadpainter.com/2009/02/13/good-bicycle-route-marking/. I personally do not like reddish/pinkish arrows. They are okay when you’re right on top of them, but I think bright white or yellow stands out better under all lighting conditions and from further awat. We also need to consider better arrow placement, somewhat larger arrows, and better marking of all unforced turns.

October 7, 2011 at 9:13 AM #490

Geo

good topic! I like our markings but they are a little confusing with the E incorporated. I think the standard circle with a direction is the simplest. I also think more is better! I agree with Tim about the color pink… wow you can notice those!

October 7, 2011 at 12:32 PM #516

Tim

Was chatting with Mike and he too likes the standard circle with direction. Even though I haven’t been involved with painting the markings it seems the circle would be easier/quicker to paint?

Jack n Back also included “wrong way” notices too. They took the standard direction circle and painted a big X over it. This marking was placed just after a cyclist would make a wrong turn.

October 7, 2011 at 5:47 PM #537

Bob Crook

The standard circle with direction bar IS definitely easier to paint. No template is required and you simply freehand the design. Either spray can or paint brush can be used. I have used this for non-ERV100 purposes.
I also agree with using wrong way arrows. This is essential on non-forced intersections.
The E arrow design simply respects tradition–it was used on the very first ERV in 1974 and we have continued ever since. If going to simple circles would be less confusing, probably neater and more economical, I would have no problem in changing from the “E”.

October 7, 2011 at 6:58 PM #538

bikerfello

I really like the idea of free-handing circles and arrows for our ERV–from the painters perspective it would be much quicker and neater. There would no longer be the need as you exit the car to grab the template nor would there be as much drippy paint in the confines of your vehicle. I personally like the bright orange paint but a high visibility yellow would also be good.
Mike Rutherford

October 7, 2011 at 7:12 PM #539

Admin (Tim)

Ok, it sounds like we’re reaching a decision on at least one aspect of this discussion. Can we all agree we would like to use hand painted directional circles for the 2012 ERV100? Upon hearing no objections, I’ll update the original topic post to reflect new markings will be hand painted in the form of a circle with a slash indicating direction.

How about discussing how many, how far apart, how far from the turn, etc.

October 7, 2011 at 8:16 PM #540

Bob Crook

Re’ Admin’s last question, please see the reference in my note of 6 Oct. which covers all these issues.

On the issue of the importance of wrong-way arrows: on the new 100-mi route there are about 15 unforced turn situations. To explain further, on these corners you don’t HAVE to make a turn (unlike at Ts) and can cruise blithely right off the course, never to return.

October 7, 2011 at 8:56 PM #552

Tim

For the benefit of those that might have missed it here is a summary of the article Bob mentioned:

Think like a rider at speed. Think about what it feels like to be there. Be considerate and thoughtful.

Put your LAST warning mark at least 50-60 feet (20-25 long paces) before any feature that requires riders to make a decision (intersections, mainly).

Give riders AT LEAST two warnings before an intersection, three or more if there’s something unusual about it like highways, turns at the bottom of hills, blind corners, etc. Give them one mark on the other side so they know they’re on the right path.

Make your marks at least 150 feet apart (50 long paces).

Use the same color, style, and size for every single mark you put on the road.

If you must hide them discretely on the edge of the pavement, put ALL of them there so your riders get used to looking in the same place.

There should be at least two or three marks, placed well apart and well before any place there’s an unknown hazard ahead or anywhere you have to do something different than just cruising along. We always try to start warning you way farther in advance than most people might think is necessary.

Be consistent. Decide how you’re going to make your arrows and make them the same way every time. Decide what you’re going to write, if anything, and write it the same way every time. Decide where your arrows are going be in relation to what you write and put them the same place every time. Put your marks in the same basic position on the road and always put them where your riders are likely to be looking. Always use the same color of paint…every time.

He later states he prefers to use inverted marking paint made by Rustoleum because It’s permanent but fades in 2-3 years. He has used chalk to mark parking lots and small local areas because it comes off easily lasting only a few days.

October 7, 2011 at 9:12 PM #553

juliah

Great discussion here guys, I love that we are finding a way of doing a better job with the road blazes, and it is also more simple. I just have one question, is there any chance that the circle markings could be confused with some of the other hand drawn circle markings on the roads? Do our routes intersect any other rides that do not have a distinctive marking? Just curious. I guess if the “painters” noticed this at the time they mark the roads they could paint ERV beside the circle?

October 7, 2011 at 9:45 PM #554

Bob Crook

Re’ Julia’s points. The unique “E” was done to identify WHICH ride as well as which way to go. Similar arrows are indeed a problem in areas with many events. In Dayton, OH, for instance, there are so many arrows at certain intersections that they have to color code them and generally to write a code for the event. This is a real pain both for the painters and the riders. I once spent 15 minutes at one of their intersections which was festooned with multiple confusing arrows, trying to figure out which way to go. In our area we don’t have that much event duplication and probably would only have to specifically identify certain arrows in just a few locations. For instance, our arrows, if the same color as Jack’n Back’s, would have to be differentiated at Raus, where we turn left and they go straight. After that it’s clear sailing.

Speaking of arrow color, it’s obvious that we hold diverging opinions as to the conspicuity of hot pink vs yellow or white. I suggest a “paint off” to settle the issue. Using the nice fresh J’n'B arrows as a reference, paint an identically sized and styled arrow in white and yellow along-side. Then take a couple of folks with no dog in the fight and see which color arrow is spotted first as the arrows are approached. No clue of course would be given to the judges. Science vs opinion, winner take all!

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 26 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.